Open Library

This looks interesting – Open Library distributing ebooks to libraries – http://openlibrary.org/borrow

Borrowing books from Open Library

There are 4 different ways find a book to borrow:

1. In-Library Loan Search

If you find yourself sitting in one of the participating in-library lending libraries, you’ll get access to a bunch of special eBooks to borrow. These loans are just like the “normal” Lending Library loans, where each title can be checked out once at a time, and your loan lasts for 2 weeks. (More info)
2. Lending Library Search

There is a small but growing collection of eBooks available to everyone with an Open Library account, anywhere in the world. These titles come to you through the book scanning program of the Internet Archive, a registered library in California.
3. eBooks, Local Library Search

We have connected thousands of Open Library records to the overdrive.com lending system. Overdrive can help you find ePub or Mobi files in your local library.
4. Physical books, Local Library

Any Open Library record with an ISBN has been connected to a service called worldcat.org, which can help you find physical books in a library near you.

I’m not sure about the OverDrive option. But it’s an interesting model.

Have any library consortia here begun negotiations with publishers, here or overseas, please let me know.

Why thank you Mr Murdoch – once again

That lovable friend of libraries – the News Ltd empire – this time in the form of publisher Harper Collins, has sprung a new one on libraries and readers. Henceforward they state libraries may only lend out their ebooks 26 times before the book deletes itself from the library’s system. This new limitation is being enforced via OverDrive, who have no problem with it, and why should they.

There has obviously been an outcry about this further diminishment of lending rights, one of the best posts on the subject  being from the Librarian in Black.

Previous posts here have mentioned how every library and reader are being screwed by every publisher and vendor. Will this further insult stop libraries from throwing public money at them, no probably not.

Update

There are many angry readers out there https://twitter.com/#search?q=%23hcod

National Library at Senate Estimates

Proof Committee Hansard
SENATE
FINANCE AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION LEGISLATION
COMMITTEE
ESTIMATES
(Additional Estimates)
MONDAY, 21 FEBRUARY 2011
CANBERRA
[10.35 pm]

National Library of Australia
CHAIR—Welcome, Dr Cathro. Do you have an opening statement?
Dr Cathro—No.
Senator TROOD—Dr Cathro, I understand that the library has appointed a new director-general. Can you
tell the committee when that director-general will take up her position?
Dr Cathro—Yes. Her name is Anne-Marie Schwirtlich. She will be taking up the position on Friday, 11 March.
Senator TROOD—What state will she find the library’s budget in for 2011-12 when she takes up her position?
Dr Cathro—Since the last estimates committee the corporate management group of the library has made
decisions about the 2011-12 budget. We are in quite a tight situation with our budget. We will be reducing staff
numbers. We have to respond to not only the efficiency dividend and the estimated three per cent increase in
employee expenses, subject to the enterprise agreement, but also our need to invest in digital library
infrastructure. Taking those things into account, we have had to make significant reductions in operational
lines in our budget. In addition to reducing staff we will naturally be reducing a number of services.
Senator TROOD—At this stage do you know how many staff you may have to reduce?
Dr Cathro—If you take as your baseline the second half of 2010, where we averaged 444 staff, we will be reducing next financial year by 17 staff.
Senator TROOD—Is the efficiency dividend contributing to that difficulty? How much of a difficulty is it contributing?
Dr Cathro—The efficiency dividend—if you put it in dollars terms—in the current financial year, I think my advice is its value is $684,000. That is part of what we have to take into account.
Senator TROOD—Have you decided how you are going to lose the staff at this stage?
Dr Cathro—Our aim is to entirely reduce staff through attrition. We have a turnover of around 10 per cent or 11 per cent per year. Management believes that it is possible to overwhelmingly deal with the reductions
through attrition and through then redeploying staff laterally into the priority positions, leaving the lesser priority positions vacant.
Senator TROOD—Does the loss of these staff involve the closing down of any programs or parts of the library’s activities?
Dr Cathro—Yes, there are a couple of examples I could give you. There is what we call retrospective cataloguing of the collection; that is, cataloguing material acquired in the past but not adequately catalogued.
That effort will be reduced. We will be reducing our level of newspaper digitisation and relying more on external funding for that activity. We had an online reference service—I can ask a librarian—that we ran
collaboratively with the state libraries. That service has now ceased. We will be increasing significantly the charges that we impose on other libraries for interlibrary loans. They are just examples of some of the budget measures. We are also making significant reductions in travel and other supplier expenses.
Senator TROOD—We do not have much time and I would like to explore these matters a little more fully but perhaps, just finally, can you briefly outline the challenge that you are facing from the digitisation revolution that we are facing?
Dr Cathro—We believe that if we are going to properly document 21st century Australia we have to collect information in digital form. We have so far built quite a rich and complex set of digital collections both
through digitising and through collecting what we call born digital information. But many of the systems we have to manage this are now 10 years old. They need replacement. We are going to invest—we feel we have
to—in some essential minimum activity in the next four years to replace those systems. In fact, that is one area where we will actually be increasing staff, to work on the replacement of those essential digital management systems. We do aspire to digitise more of our collection in the longer term. But to date I think we have only digitised about two per cent of our collection after 10 years of effort.
Senator TROOD—Two per cent?
Dr Cathro—Yes.
Senator TROOD—I would like to ask more questions, but unfortunately we do not have any more time.
Senator HUMPHRIES—The then Acting Secretary of the Department of Parliamentary Services a couple of weeks ago, in commenting on the lack of space in this building, said that the Parliamentary Library could be forced to move some of its research archives to the National Library. Where would you put them?
Dr Cathro—I was contacted by the Parliamentary Librarian, who suggested that the interpretation of that report should not be relied on. I can only say that we are due to run out of physical space some time in 2014, so that would be a problem for us.
CHAIR—Thank you for appearing before us.